iHV welcomes the news of the government’s plans to extend Best Start Family Hubs, opening nationwide support for families across England. Building on the legacy of Sure Start, the new Best Start Family Hubs aim to help families with a range of support, including free stay-and-play sessions for babies and young children, help with infant feeding, parenting advice, early support for children with SEND, and health visiting services – all in one place, reducing the need to pay for private classes or specialist support.

Over 200 new Best Start Family Hubs are in areas not previously funded and are now open to families. These form the first wave of up to 1,000 hubs across all local authorities by the end of 2028, with 800 expected to be operating as Best Start Family Hubs by the end of April.

New guidance published today sets out the government’s plans to bring the services that families rely on together under one roof, making it easier to get help at the right time – described as ‘reimagining Sure Start for the modern age through a more joined-up system of support’.

The government is also making a new commitment to deliver up to 2,000 satellite locations by the end of 2028 – based in health centres, leisure centres, libraries and churches – so families experience seamless support in the places they already go.

The programme builds on the legacy of Sure Start, while updating family services for the modern world – combining face-to-face and digital support, strong partnerships with early years settings, and better use of existing community partners and spaces.

Every Best Start Family Hub will include dedicated outreach workers to reach families, alongside a practitioner to help identify additional needs early – particularly those who might otherwise fall through the cracks – helping them access the right support sooner without being passed between services.

Alongside this, Healthy Babies support will be delivered through Best Start Family Hubs – bringing together health and early support such as midwifery, health visiting, infant feeding and perinatal mental health support so families get a more joined-up experience from day one.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting said:

I want babies born this year to grow up as the healthiest generation than any before it – and that means building good habits early.

“We know that the earliest years of a child’s life shape everything that follows. But for too long, families have had to navigate a maze of services at the very moment they need simple, straightforward help.

“We’re making it easier for families to get the right support in one place – from pregnancy onwards.

“That means spotting problems earlier, stepping in sooner, and moving care closer to the communities that need it most.”

Today, the Department of Health and Social Care published its long-awaited policy blueprint for improving child and family health. The Healthy Child Programme (HCP) is the national framework for improving the health and wellbeing of children and young people aged 0 to 19 (age 25 for care leavers or those living with special educational needs and disabilities) in England.

It sets out evidence-based approaches to prevention, early intervention and family support – supporting the government’s ambition of raising the healthiest ever generation of children.

The updated Healthy Child Programme (HCP) is presented in a suite of resources, including refreshed:

  • Delivery guidance which outlines the expected delivery expectations for public health nursing teams for ages 0 to 19 and their provider organisations.
  • Commissioning guidance which sets standards for commissioners to establish, monitor and assure the quality of public health nursing services for ages 0 to 19 delivered by provider organisations.
  • High-impact area framework which complements these by translating principles into nationally recognised, actionable priorities across ages 0 to 19.

The Department of Health and Social Care has thanked the hundreds of people and organisations (including the Institute of Health Visiting) who contributed feedback for the development of the guidance. Following feedback on the lack of clarity in the previous HCP guidance and wide variation in service equity and quality across England, the purpose of the refreshed guidance is:

  • To make the guidance clearer and easier to use for commissioners, providers and practitioners.
  • To strengthen assurance around service delivery.
  • To ensure the consistency of service quality nationwide.
  • To better reflect emerging population health trend and better align with the direction of travel set out in Fit for the future: 10-year health plan and in the context of other government ambitions, including Giving children the best start in life.

Whilst the guidance does not introduce any new statutory duties, it reaffirms the importance of health visitors as a qualified clinical public health workforce and their vital role in healthcare and prevention (from preconception to age 5).

It also maintains the clinical importance of face-to-face contact (where these have drifted in some areas), the importance of high-quality care, and the breadth of health visitor’s role across multiple clinical pathways and ‘high-impact areas’ – while also embedding digital options and supporting research and innovation to ensure services remain proportionate and responsive.

Alison Morton, iHV CEO, provided her initial thoughts on the new guidance:

“We welcome the publication of the updated Healthy Child Programme, which powerfully reaffirms why health visitors are essential and provides a clear, national benchmark for the quality expected in commissioning and delivering services. For too long, families have faced a postcode lottery of health visiting support in the crucial earliest years – a costly mistake in both human and financial terms, leaving too many without support when they needed it most.

“This guidance is an important step forward. By offering long overdue clarity, when fully implemented, it has the potential to transform the quality and consistency of support available to all families. It recognises and enables the full contribution of health visitors, as Specialist Community Public Health Nurses, to help create the healthiest generation of children ever.

“It goes without saying, that this guidance will only be turned into reality with a strong workforce plan to deliver it – and we look forward to seeing this reflected in the forthcoming 10-Year NHS Workforce Plan and supporting its delivery.”

We are still working our way through the details and would value your thoughts on the guidance.

The new HCP focuses on:

  • The importance of health visitors (as registered and regulated Specialist Community Public Health Nurses) to lead the delivery of the HCP. This is crucial to ensure quality and safety. The guidance states that every family should be allocated a named health visitor, to support continuity of care and the relationships required for safe and effective practice.
  • The importance of home visiting – to enable health visitors to gain a fuller understanding of the family’s living conditions and dynamics, which are central to a robust assessment of health needs. The guidance recognises that certain indicators of risk may not be apparent in clinical or community settings.
  • Proportionate levels of service to meet individual needs (all 4 levels of support should be available within every local authority, with service delivery tailored to assessed individual needs):
      Community
    Universal
    Targeted
    Specialist
  • Clarity on purpose and content of health reviews – and role of the health visitor:
    A minimum of 5 health and development reviews must be offered (with 3 suggested targeted reviews). In line with best practice, the antenatal, new birth and 6-to-8-week health and development reviews should be delivered face to face in the home by a health visitor.
    Other reviews may be offered in alternative settings (including Family Hubs and Neighbourhood health centres) based on family preference and individual circumstances, rather than service convenience.
    Named health visitors should deliver all 5 statutory health and development reviews at specified stages to support continuity of care and relationship building.
    In certain circumstances, a health visitor may delegate a review to a suitably qualified health professional or nursery nurse, provided they are supervised and the health visitor maintains overall accountability.
  • Clarity on the purpose of health visitors’ targeted and specialist service offer:
    At the targeted level, practitioners deliver additional support based on an assessment identifying specific needs (including a targeted-indicated and targeted-selective offer).
      At the specialist level, practitioners deliver substantial interventions for families requiring intensive or more complex care, based on ongoing assessment. The HCP clearly sets out statutory obligations for specific populations and the crucial role of health visitors in identification, early support and access to services.
  • Safeguarding: Includes description of the role of health visitors and requirements on local authorities to consider capacity of the health visitor workforce and prioritise delivery of the HCP.
  • Collaboration – integration with Family Hubs and Neighbourhood Health Centres: The 10-Year Health Plan commits to the inclusion of health visiting services within Neighbourhood Health Centres, stating ‘health visitors should be system leaders and active partners in neighbourhood teams’. Health services are also a major component of effective Best Start Family Hubs.
  • Workforce capacity: The workforce that delivers the HCP – and its numbers, skill mix ratios (and therefore competencies of the different staff) and training commissions – should be based on the current population need. The guidance includes details of provider organisations’ responsibility to ensure that services are delivered by enough appropriate practitioners with the necessary qualifications, skills and experience to carry out the work effectively (including adherence to the NMC Code requirements on scope of competence, delegation, accountability and supervision).
  • Workforce and service sustainability: The guidance highlights that delivery of the HCP depends on strategic investment in the qualified SCPHN workforce across both health visiting and school nursing services. Commissioners and provider organisations should ensure there is sufficient SCPHN capacity to lead, deliver and research care safely and effectively for all babies, children, young people and families.
  • Workforce development: Clarity on roles and responsibilities, and skills needed to deliver the remit of the HCP and high-impact areas. Clearer supervision, preceptorship and mentoring guidance, alongside continuous professional development to support safe and effective practice and an emphasis on local workforce planning and career development (including recognition of the value of specialist health visitor roles).
  • Digital delivery: Improved data sharing, integrated digital records and tailored digital resources; reflect direction set out in the 10-Year Health Plan on digital delivery (whilst ensuring safe and effective practice).
  • Quality and implementation: with expectations on a clear approach to monitoring, auditing and benchmarking to secure expected outcomes for babies, children, young people and families – with a focus on purpose and assessment against outcomes. The guidance includes a full list of KPIs for national reporting, and commissioners are also encouraged to introduce their own local KPIs (with examples provided).
  • Parental engagement and inclusive practice: Services delivered by 0 to 19 public health nursing teams as part of the HCP should actively engage families from the earliest point of contact, beginning in the antenatal period (including both parents and wider family members where possible). The guidance also highlights the importance of co-production – the design, delivery and review of services should be shaped in response to feedback from children, young people and families.

Read the full suite of HCP documents:

On Friday 15 December, the Department for Education (DfE) published its updated version of “Working Together to Safeguard Children 2023”. The Department consulted with key stakeholders on proposed changes through an open consultation process between June and September this year.

To support the consultation, the Institute of Health Visiting engaged in meetings with DfE officials and submitted a written submission to the consultation in September 2023. Our considered position was developed in partnership with frontline practitioners, service leads, safeguarding representatives and our iHV Expert Advisers for Safeguarding, and through an iHV Roundtable event in August 2023 – you can read our written response to the consultation here.

“Working Together to Safeguard Children 2023” focuses on strengthening multi-agency working. It brings together new and existing guidance to emphasise that successful outcomes for children depend on strong multi-agency partnership working across the whole system of help, support and protection including effective work from all agencies with parents, carers, and families. We support this position – safeguarding is everyone’s business. There is a clear imperative to strengthen services to ensure that the most vulnerable babies, children and young people in our society are supported to achieve their full potential and are protected from harm.

This statutory guidance sets out key roles for individuals, organisations and agencies to deliver effective arrangements. It covers the legislative requirements, a framework for the three local safeguarding partners (local authorities, Integrated Care Boards and police), and a framework for child death reviews.  This revision has a renewed focus on how organisations and agencies provide:

  • Early help
  • Safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children
  • Child protection.

Of relevance to health visiting, the guidance introduces changes to the lead practitioner role. It clarifies that a broader range of practitioner can be the lead practitioner for children and families receiving support and services under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 (Child in Need), and the requirements on local authorities and their partners to agree and set out local governance arrangements.
The guidance states:

“Once the referral has been accepted by local authority children’s social care, a social work qualified practice supervisor or manager should decide, with partners where appropriate, who the most appropriate lead practitioner will be and, with the lead practitioner’s agreement, allocate them in line with the local protocol.

The lead practitioner role can be held by a range of people, including social workers. When allocating the lead practitioner, local authorities and their partners should consider the needs of the child and their family to ensure the lead practitioner has the time required to undertake the role. The lead practitioner should have the skills, knowledge, competence, and experience to work effectively with the child and their family. The lead practitioner should always be a social worker for child protection enquiries.”

Our response to the Working Together consultation sets out our position on this. To ensure that the key preventative public health role of health visitors is not compromised, we strongly recommend that implementation and prioritisation decisions take account of the full breadth of the Health Visiting Model for England, and support delivery of the Healthy Child Programme in full. Health visitors deliver important ‘health’ functions within a whole system approach that cannot be overlooked. These support clinical pathways across the NHS (urgent, primary and secondary care) and education (child development, school readiness and Special Education Needs and Disabilities (SEND)), alongside child safeguarding. For example, supporting parents to manage minor illnesses (read our latest evidence review on the crisis in urgent care for children 0-4years), providing interventions for families affected by perinatal mental illness and a range of physical needs in the postnatal care pathway, reducing risk factors for preventable disease (addressing smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol risks and physical inactivity) and early identification and support for children with developmental delay and SEND.

We recognise that there may be occasions when having a health visitor as the lead practitioner might be in the best interest of the child and we set these out in our consultation response – in summary:

  • We do not support the case that health visitors should be the default lead practitioner for all babies and young children categorised as “Child in Need”.
  • Designation of the lead practitioner needs to be agreed on a case-by-case basis, in the best interests of the child, and only when the health visiting service is sufficiently resourced (not as a sticking plaster for an under-resourced children’s social care department). For example, when a family is being supported through a preventative public health, health visitor-led, intensive home visiting programme like the Family Nurse Partnership Programme or the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting (MECSH) programme, or through a targeted programme of health visiting support for a child with Special Education Needs and Disabilities (SEND).
  • However, care needs to be taken as there is a significant risk that, without sufficient resource, focusing health visitors’ efforts on statutory Child in Need cases will further accelerate their role drift away from preventative public health and earlier intervention (this was flagged as a national risk in our “State of Health Visiting” survey, published in 2023). Health visitors’ important “upstream” role is focused primarily on preventing, identifying and working with families to address problems before they reach crisis point. This takes pressure off children’s social care and is less costly in the long run. Health visiting is the only agency that proactively and systematically reaches out to all families with babies and young children from pregnancy and through the earliest years of life – this is a safety-critical function that needs to be protected at all costs. Without sufficient resource, eroding this “safety-net” further strips out the mechanism to identify vulnerable babies and young children.

The “Working Together to Safeguard Children 2023” guidance also includes:

  • New national multi-agency child protection standards which set out actions, considerations and behaviours for improved child protection practice and outcomes for children.
  • Clarification of roles and responsibilities of health practitioners, with specific duties for child safeguarding.
  • Domestic Abuse Act 2021 legislation and the National Framework statutory guidance that supports a child-centred approach.
  • Updated guidance and terminology on the management of child deaths and the language around the responsibility of professionals where relevant, to inform relevant safeguarding partners and the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel.
  • Guidance on Improving practice with children, young people and families which provides advice for local areas to embed working together to safeguard children and the children’s social care national framework in practice.

Funding:

The Department for Education (DfE) has announced that it is investing more than £7 million, over the next 2 years to support local areas. This consists of £6.48 million grant funding in January 2024, for safeguarding partners to:

  • Make changes to multi-agency safeguarding arrangements in light of the revised Working Together to Safeguard Children statutory guidance.
  • Build a shared understanding between agencies of what the national framework means for multi-agency working.

This funding does not cover the costs of service delivery and sustainability. The guidance sets out an expectation that “leaders are ambitious about helping, supporting, and protecting children in their area and jointly prioritise and share resources accordingly”. If fully implemented, it is clear that these changes will place additional burdens on the health visiting workforce, shifting responsibilities from children’s social care to other services.

We are concerned that, as the costs of child protection continue to soar, budgets will not be redistributed to offset the additional burdens that this guidance places on organisations taking on the lead practitioner responsibilities. Prioritisation is likely to favour statutory responsibilities. Without addressing funding and health visiting workforce issues, services will be pressurised to prioritise “Child in Need” cases at the expense of preventative public health, leaving more families without the support that they need in other areas and proving much more costly in the long run.

This guidance presents an important opportunity to improve the care, support and safety of babies, children and young people. Its success will depend on its implementation as part of a whole system approach that also includes prevention and early intervention. As this directive represents a new national policy, we strongly recommend that its implementation is subject to the scrutiny of the Office for Budget Responsibility to ensure that it is fully costed and any additional burdens placed on services are managed with a commensurate budget uplift, workforce planning and action to address the current postcode lottery of health visiting service provision.

Next steps:

NHS Safeguarding is developing a safeguarding workplan to support the implementation of this guidance (we understand that the draft plan is due in mid-January 2024). At the iHV, we will be working closely with officials in the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, NHS Safeguarding, and partners in other professional bodies and organisations including the School and Public Health Nurses Association, Association of Directors of Public Health and Local Government Association, to consider the specific implications of the Working Together 2023 guidance for health visiting and to support its implementation in practice.

The full suite of Working Together 2023 documents is available here:

This week has seen a raft of policy publications from the Department of Health and Social Care. Read our quick update and signposting to resources:

The  Health and Care Act 2022 has introduced new architecture to the health and care system, with England formally divided into 42 area-based Integrated Care Systems, covering populations of around 500,000 to 3 million people. Integrated Care Systems are partnerships of health and care organisations that come together to plan and deliver joined up services, with the aim of improving health and reducing inequalities for people who live and work in their area.

Specifically this will lead to the establishment of Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and Integrated Care Partnerships (ICPs). Previously, Health and wellbeing boards (HWBs) have been a key mechanism for driving joined-up working at a local level since they were established in 2013.

In this new landscape, HWBs continue to play an important role in:

  • instilling mechanisms for joint working across health and care organisations
  • setting strategic direction to improve the health and wellbeing of people locally

The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) will therefore be updating the guidance on the HWBs general duties and powers to provide information on how HWBs currently work and clarify their role within the system – including working with ICBs and ICPs.

There is a significant step forward in national policy (in which iHV had an input) to see that the usual reference to children and young people, now includes the addition of ‘babies’ in their own right – this guidance marks a key step in ensuring that babies, children, young people and families will be prioritised in the new Integrated Care Systems. Amongst other provisions, the guidance sets out that engagement on strategies should be inclusive of children, young people and their families, including new and expectant parents. There is also an explicit section on how babies, children, young people, and families should be considered in the content of the strategies.

New Guidance

  • Health and wellbeing boards: draft guidance for engagement
    This draft guidance for engagement sets out the role of health and wellbeing boards following publication of the Health and Care Act 2022.
  • Guidance on the preparation of integrated care strategies
    This is statutory guidance for integrated care partnerships on the preparation of integrated care strategies. This document contains an introduction, 2 sections of statutory guidance on the preparation of the integrated care strategy including involvement and content, and a section of non-statutory guidance relating to the publication and review of the integrated care strategy.
  • Health overview and scrutiny committee principles
    This guidance sets out the expectations on how health overview and scrutiny committees should work with integrated care systems (ICSs) to ensure they are locally accountable to their communities.

In March 2022, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published a new comprehensive quality standard designed to improve the diagnosis and assessment of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). The NICE guidance says midwives and other healthcare professionals (including health visitors) should give clear and consistent advice on avoiding alcohol throughout pregnancy, and explain the benefits of this, including preventing FASD and reducing the risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and the baby being small for gestational age.

The NICE quality standard highlights five key areas for improvement:

  • Pregnant women are given advice throughout pregnancy not to drink alcohol.
  • Pregnant women are asked about their alcohol use throughout their pregnancy, and this is recorded.
  • Children and young people with probable prenatal alcohol exposure and significant physical, developmental, or behavioural difficulties are referred for assessment.
  • Children and young people with confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure or all 3 facial features associated with prenatal alcohol exposure have a neurodevelopmental assessment if there are clinical concerns.
  • Children and young people with a diagnosis of FASD have a management plan to address their needs.

Updated GPPs

As a result, we have updated two Good Practice Points (GPPs) which now include links to the recently published NICE guidance:


Please note that GPPs are available to iHV members only.

If you’re not a member, please join us to get access to all of our resources.

The iHV is a self-funding charity – we can only be successful in our mission to strengthen health visiting practice if the health visiting profession and its supporters join us on our journey. We rely on our membership to develop new resources for our members.

So do join us now!

button small_200

iHV welcomes yesterday’s publication of PHE guidance on Care continuity between midwifery and health visiting services: principles for practice.

The PHE guidance document is designed to act as a tool to support local practice implementation and improvements in the care continuity between midwifery and health visiting services. It was developed based on a literature search of current research, an examination of current UK guidance and policy and interviewing midwives and health visitors working in Local Maternity Systems. The document provides evidence and practice examples to consider when improving quality of care through effective transition of information and collaborative practice between midwifery and health visiting services.

Alison Morton, Executive Director at the Institute of Health Visiting, commented:

“We support and welcome this new guidance from Public Health England on the care continuity between midwifery and health visiting.

“We know from our iHV annual surveys that continuity of care and building trusting relationships with parents is critical for delivering good support in the first 1001 days. Improving the quality of care for parents and their babies throughout their maternity journey, through the effective sharing of information and collaborative practice between midwifery and health visiting services, will help ensure that consistent and evidence-based information is given. Continuity of care, as well as continuity of carer (they are not the same thing), between midwifery and health visiting is crucial to ensure that health visitors provide safe and personalised care – tailored to each family’s individual needs.”

Clare Livingstone, Professional Policy Advisor at the Royal College of Midwives, said:

“This will be a valuable resource for midwives and health visitors in facilitating women to have the smoothest possible journey throughout and beyond their pregnancy. The point at which women’s care is transferred from midwives to health visitors, at around 10-14 days after the birth, is a critical point in that journey. This toolkit will support a better and more efficient handover of care, joining up the two services and ensuring care continuity for women and their babies.”

Following the Prime Minister’s announcement last night of more stringent guidance to “Stay at Home”, we know that many of you will be asking questions about how this impacts your families and the important services that you provide. This is also a worrying time for families who may be wanting to access helpful parenting information. The Institute is doing all we can to support the government-led decisions (nationally and locally) by disseminating any guidance as soon as it is published to avoid confusion and mixed messages at this time when clarity is needed.

We have a dedicated COVID-19 section of our website which we are using to provide updates as and when they are received.

Our colleagues at Public Health England and local government are moving at extraordinary pace and scale at this time – we thank and applaud them for all their efforts during the unfolding events of this pandemic.

Following the PM’s announcement last night, the latest advice has been received:

Outline details of priority work is set out in the NHS COVID-19 Prioritisation within Community Health Services published last Friday.  The NHS are currently developing a more detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that will be published soon – the NHS are custodians of the SOP as this avoids confusion, retaining a single line of communication.  It is high level covering all community services (under NHS standard contract). PHE expect that common approach will be applied across all services.

PHE are aware that families understandably do not want home visits so it makes sense to prepare advice ahead of the SOP being published.

Viv Bennett, the Chief Nurse at PHE, has given us the following holding advice: “I think that what is clear is that the presumption should be that contacts will be virtual – skype, facetime and failing that phone call.  There will need to be individual assessment of compelling need for face to face contacts and then decisions re PPE”.

The iHV will be supporting this work by developing guidance for health visitors to address questions like, “What makes an effective virtual visit especially for AN breastfeeding support and NBV”.

We share some of the latest Government guidance on our website – both for families and healthcare professionals:

This information is being regularly reviewed and updated.  We will be adding more content regarding supportive resources for parents and carers in the coming days and weeks make this a repository of best advice for families during these difficult times – so bookmark these pages for any further updates. We have waivered our usual restrictions on resources for members and the COVID-19 sections of our website are “free access” to all to support the national response to this pandemic.

We suggest that you also keep a look out on the government COVID-19 update web pages and contact your local commissioner and Director of Public Health who will be coordinating the response to the NHS guidance in your area.

We have received numerous enquiries from health visitors asking for greater clarity for the health visiting service during the COVID-19 pandemic.  The Institute is doing all we can to expedite this information for the profession and have a dedicated COVID-19 section of our website which we are using to provide updates as and when they are received. However, at the moment the content still lacks this much needed detail for health visitors’ roles.

We have contacted Public Health England, the Local Government Association and the Association of Directors of Public Health to highlight the need for advice to manage the numerous queries that we are receiving from health visitors, including service leads around emergency planning and escalation for the health visiting service – things like, “should we carry on with universal contacts?” “Will I be redeployed? And if so, when?” “What about families who have safeguarding concerns or high levels of vulnerability?” “Am I in a priority key-worker group?” etc…

The latest update that we have received from Public Health England is that the NHS is leading on drafting guidance on community services including health visiting. PHE and local government have provided advice and we are awaiting publication.  We will alert our members and followers when we receive advice that it has been published – hopefully very soon. As there is considerable pressure and pace within the healthcare system due to the pandemic, we suggest that you also keep a look out on the government COVID-19 update web pages and contact your local commissioner and Director of Public Health who will be coordinating the response to the NHS guidance in your area.

Our position at the iHV is that we need to support the government-led decisions (nationally and locally) rather than issuing our own guidance which may cause confusion and mixed messages at this time when clarity is needed.

We will continue to do all that we can to help.

A big thank you to everyone working in health visiting at this time. You are all doing an amazing job during the uncertainties of the COVID-19 situation – it is comforting to know that we have great teams of people who care so much about the communities they work in, and the health and wellbeing of families.

Many parents are very concerned about how to feed their babies during the COVID-19 outbreak.  Here, we share the latest statement on best practice from Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative – who also suggest that all practitioners follow latest updates from the UK governments and the World Health Organization (WHO) as these could change as more information becomes available.

The Unicef statement (on the link below) includes:

  • Public Health England (PHE) guidance – If you are breastfeeding while infected
  • Accessing infant formula – information from First Steps Nutrition Trust

 

In addition, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) has updated their guidance on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and pregnancy (published today 18 March) to reflect the announcement on Monday evening (16 March) that pregnant women have been placed in a ‘vulnerable group’. Check the summary of updates on pages 3-5 to see all the changes.

As a result RCOG Information for pregnant women is updated: